论文标题
不均匀两流体混合的本地波数模型
Local Wave Number Model for Inhomogeneous Two-Fluid Mixing
论文作者
论文摘要
我们介绍了瑞利 - 泰勒(RT)不稳定性的两点光谱湍流模型(局部波 - 噪声模型或LWN模型)。将模型结果与从RT问题的三维模拟中提取的统计量进行了比较。这些模拟在放置在光流体顶部的重型流体的界面处的高波数扰动初始化,以使密度梯度朝着由于重力而与加速度相反的方向。我们认为低至中密度对比度的流量将LWN模型与使用混合宽度演化作为主要度量的模拟数据进行比较。原始模型指定了物理合理的,但在很大程度上\ emph {Adhoc}术语是为了说明种植混合层所涉及的不均匀机制。我们通过与模拟进行比较,系统地评估LWN模型方程中每个术语的作用。其中两个是为了维持密度和特定体积之间维持有限协方差的运动源项,以及作为密度特异性 - 体积协方差的光谱修饰引入的光谱失真项,都导致混合层的生长严重普遍。消除这两个术语的简化模型被证明可以改善混合宽度演化的捕获以及在不同时间跨混合层的湍流质量速度剖面。但是,这种简化表明,对其他指标(例如密度特异性 - 体积协方差)和湍流动能的保真度有所损害。讨论了有关RT问题的物理学的含义,我们将这项研究作为实际使用这种模型的指南。
We present a study of a two-point spectral turbulence model (Local Wave-Number model or LWN model) for the Rayleigh-Taylor (RT) instability. The model outcomes are compared with statistical quantities extracted from three-dimensional simulation of the RT problem. These simulations are initialized with high wavenumber perturbations at the interface of a heavy fluid placed on top of a light fluid so that the density gradient is in the direction opposite to acceleration due to gravity. We consider flows of low to medium density contrast and compare the LWN model against simulation data using the mix-width evolution as the primary metric. The original model specified physically reasonable but largely \emph{ad hoc} terms to account for the inhomogeneous mechanisms involved in growing the mixing layer. We systematically assess the role of each of the terms in the LWN model equations by comparison with simulation. Two of these, the kinematic source term, introduced to maintain a finite covariance between density and specific volume, and a spectral distortion term, introduced as spectral modifications of the density-specific-volume covariance, both result in severely over-predicting the mix layer growth. A simplified model eliminating those two terms is shown to improve the capture of both mix-width evolution as well as the turbulent mass flux velocity profiles across the mix layer at different times. However, this simplification reveals that fidelity to other metrics such as the density-specific-volume covariance, and the turbulent kinetic energy are somewhat compromised. The implications of this outcome are discussed with respect to the physics of the RT problem, and we provide this study as a guide for the practical use of such a model.