论文标题
Twitter上的Covid-19错误信息的探索性研究
An Exploratory Study of COVID-19 Misinformation on Twitter
论文作者
论文摘要
在19日期的大流行期间,社交媒体已成为错误信息的主场。为了解决这一不良的科学监督,以及危机管理从业者的更好理解。我们已经在Twitter上对Covid-19的主题进行了探索性研究,作者和误解的内容,以便获得早期见解。我们收集了在2020年1月至7月中旬之间的92多个专业事实检查组织与Covid-19判决中提到的所有推文,并与社区分享了这一语料库。这导致了1500个与1 274个错误和276个部分错误主张有关的推文。对作者帐户的探索性分析表明,经过验证的Twitter手柄(包括组织/名人)也参与创建(新推文)或传播(转发)错误信息。此外,我们发现虚假主张比部分错误的主张更快。与COVID-19的背景语料库相比,具有错误信息的推文通常关注社交媒体上的其他信息。作者使用的暂定语言较少,似乎更受到对他人潜在伤害的担忧。我们的结果使我们能够在当前对该主题的科学覆盖范围内提出差距,并为当局和社交媒体用户提出措施来抵制错误信息。
During the COVID-19 pandemic, social media has become a home ground for misinformation. To tackle this infodemic, scientific oversight, as well as a better understanding by practitioners in crisis management, is needed. We have conducted an exploratory study into the propagation, authors and content of misinformation on Twitter around the topic of COVID-19 in order to gain early insights. We have collected all tweets mentioned in the verdicts of fact-checked claims related to COVID-19 by over 92 professional fact-checking organisations between January and mid-July 2020 and share this corpus with the community. This resulted in 1 500 tweets relating to 1 274 false and 276 partially false claims, respectively. Exploratory analysis of author accounts revealed that the verified twitter handle(including Organisation/celebrity) are also involved in either creating (new tweets) or spreading (retweet) the misinformation. Additionally, we found that false claims propagate faster than partially false claims. Compare to a background corpus of COVID-19 tweets, tweets with misinformation are more often concerned with discrediting other information on social media. Authors use less tentative language and appear to be more driven by concerns of potential harm to others. Our results enable us to suggest gaps in the current scientific coverage of the topic as well as propose actions for authorities and social media users to counter misinformation.