论文标题
用于合并的RT-PCR测试的COVID-19检测的压缩传感方法
A Compressed Sensing Approach to Pooled RT-PCR Testing for COVID-19 Detection
论文作者
论文摘要
我们提出了“挂毯”,这是一种与定量逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)一起应用于COVID-19测试的新型方法,可以导致测试时间和测试套件的较短测试时间和保护时间。 Tapestry将压缩传感和组合组测试的想法与用于生成合成数据的RT-PCR的新型噪声模型相结合。与布尔组测试算法不同,输入是每个测试的定量读数,输出是每个样品相对于病毒载荷最高的池的病毒载荷列表。虽然其他合并技术需要第二种确认性测定,但挂毯在一轮测试中获得单个样本级别的结果,在临床上可接受的假阳性或假阴性率下。我们还提出了用于汇总矩阵的设计,以促进受感染样品的良好预测,同时保持可行。当测试$ n $样品中,其中$ k \ ll n $被感染时,我们的方法在使用随机二进制池矩阵时只需$ o(k \ log n)$测试,并且概率很高。但是,我们还使用基于Kirkman Triple Systems的组合设计思想的确定性二元合并矩阵来平衡良好的重建属性和矩阵稀疏之间,以易于合并。实际上,我们已经观察到与随机合并矩阵相比,使用此类矩阵的测试需要更少的测试。这使得挂毯能够以低的患病率节省大量节省,同时即使以高达9.5 \%的患病率也保持可行。从经验上讲,我们发现单轮挂毯池在所需的测试数量中几乎将两轮的Dorfman汇总提高了几乎2倍。我们在定量RT-PCR分析中使用低聚物的模拟和湿实验室实验验证挂毯。最后,我们描述了用于部署的用例场景。
We propose `Tapestry', a novel approach to pooled testing with application to COVID-19 testing with quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) that can result in shorter testing time and conservation of reagents and testing kits. Tapestry combines ideas from compressed sensing and combinatorial group testing with a novel noise model for RT-PCR used for generation of synthetic data. Unlike Boolean group testing algorithms, the input is a quantitative readout from each test and the output is a list of viral loads for each sample relative to the pool with the highest viral load. While other pooling techniques require a second confirmatory assay, Tapestry obtains individual sample-level results in a single round of testing, at clinically acceptable false positive or false negative rates. We also propose designs for pooling matrices that facilitate good prediction of the infected samples while remaining practically viable. When testing $n$ samples out of which $k \ll n$ are infected, our method needs only $O(k \log n)$ tests when using random binary pooling matrices, with high probability. However, we also use deterministic binary pooling matrices based on combinatorial design ideas of Kirkman Triple Systems to balance between good reconstruction properties and matrix sparsity for ease of pooling. In practice, we have observed the need for fewer tests with such matrices than with random pooling matrices. This makes Tapestry capable of very large savings at low prevalence rates, while simultaneously remaining viable even at prevalence rates as high as 9.5\%. Empirically we find that single-round Tapestry pooling improves over two-round Dorfman pooling by almost a factor of 2 in the number of tests required. We validate Tapestry in simulations and wet lab experiments with oligomers in quantitative RT-PCR assays. Lastly, we describe use-case scenarios for deployment.