论文标题
通过$ψ$ -LEALNING INCOLATED LINEAR非高斯无循环模型($ψ$ -Lingam)从fmri使用$ψ$的因果推断
Causal inference of brain connectivity from fMRI with $ψ$-Learning Incorporated Linear non-Gaussian Acyclic Model ($ψ$-LiNGAM)
论文作者
论文摘要
功能连接性(FC)已通过识别大脑网络相互作用以及最终如何产生认知来理解大脑功能的主要手段。 FC的流行定义是测得的大脑区域之间的统计关联。但是,这可能是有问题的,因为协会只能提供利益区域之间的空间连接,而不能提供因果关系。因此,有必要研究其因果关系。在最近的FC研究中已应用了定向的无环图(DAG)模型,但经常遇到问题,例如样本量有限和大量变量(即高维问题),这既导致计算困难和收敛问题。结果,使用DAG模型是有问题的,其中DAG模型通常是不确定的多项式时间(NP-HARD)。为此,我们提出了一个$ψ$ - 学习包含的线性非高斯无环模型($ψ$ -Lingam)。我们使用关联模型($ψ$ - 学习)来促进因果推断,并且该模型尤其是在高维情况下效果很好。我们的仿真结果表明,所提出的方法比检测图形结构和方向的几个现有方法更强大,更准确。然后,我们将其应用于从公共可获得的费城神经发育队列(PNC)获得的静止状态fMRI(RSFMRI)数据,以研究认知差异,其中包括855个年龄在8-22岁之间的个人。在其中,我们确定了三种类型的集线器结构:内置式,内线和SUM-HUB,分别对应于接收,发送和中继信息的中心。我们还检测到了16对最重要的因果流。几个结果已被证实具有生物学意义。
Functional connectivity (FC) has become a primary means of understanding brain functions by identifying brain network interactions and, ultimately, how those interactions produce cognitions. A popular definition of FC is by statistical associations between measured brain regions. However, this could be problematic since the associations can only provide spatial connections but not causal interactions among regions of interests. Hence, it is necessary to study their causal relationship. Directed acyclic graph (DAG) models have been applied in recent FC studies but often encountered problems such as limited sample sizes and large number of variables (namely high-dimensional problems), which lead to both computational difficulty and convergence issues. As a result, the use of DAG models is problematic, where the identification of DAG models in general is nondeterministic polynomial time hard (NP-hard). To this end, we propose a $ψ$-learning incorporated linear non-Gaussian acyclic model ($ψ$-LiNGAM). We use the association model ($ψ$-learning) to facilitate causal inferences and the model works well especially for high-dimensional cases. Our simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method is more robust and accurate than several existing ones in detecting graph structure and direction. We then applied it to the resting state fMRI (rsfMRI) data obtained from the publicly available Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (PNC) to study the cognitive variance, which includes 855 individuals aged 8-22 years. Therein, we have identified three types of hub structure: the in-hub, out-hub and sum-hub, which correspond to the centers of receiving, sending and relaying information, respectively. We also detected 16 most important pairs of causal flows. Several of the results have been verified to be biologically significant.