论文标题
数字民主中的身份和人格:在化名政党和其他人格证明中评估包容,平等,安全和隐私
Identity and Personhood in Digital Democracy: Evaluating Inclusion, Equality, Security, and Privacy in Pseudonym Parties and Other Proofs of Personhood
论文作者
论文摘要
数字身份似乎是数字民主的先决条件:我们如何在不识别选民的情况下在线确保“一个人,一票”?但是数字身份解决方案 - ID检查,生物识别技术,自我主张身份和信任网络 - 所有当前缺陷,使用户容易受到排除,身份损失或盗窃以及强制性的影响。这些缺陷可能是无法克服的,因为数字身份是拉动马车的推车。在我们建立“数字人格”的稳固基础之前,我们无法实现数字身份以确保数字民主的重量。尽管身份是通过属性或隶属关系来区分一个人与另一个人的,但人格是要赋予所有真实的人不可剥夺的数字参与权,而独立于身份,包括通过身份损失,盗窃,胁迫或伪造来保护其民主权利的侵蚀。 我们探索并分析了可能提供这种缺失基础的“人格证明”的替代方法。化名派对将定期物理世界事件的透明度与事件之间的数字代币的力量结合在一起。这些代币代表有限期限但可再生的索赔可用于在线投票或流动民主,采样陪审团或审议民意调查,耐虐待的社会交流或以无许可的加密货币中的普遍基本收入。增强化名派对以为参与者提供持久的身体安全和隐私时刻,可以解决困扰当今电子投票系统的胁迫和投票风险。我们还研究了其他提出的人格证明方法,其中一些提供了便利,例如全线参与。不幸的是,这些替代方案目前无法满足所有关键的数字人格目标,但对我们面临的挑战提供了宝贵的见解。
Digital identity seems like a prerequisite for digital democracy: how can we ensure "one person, one vote" online without identifying voters? But digital identity solutions - ID checking, biometrics, self-sovereign identity, and trust networks - all present flaws, leaving users vulnerable to exclusion, identity loss or theft, and coercion. These flaws may be insurmountable because digital identity is a cart pulling the horse. We cannot achieve digital identity secure enough for the weight of digital democracy, until we build it on a solid foundation of "digital personhood." While identity is about distinguishing one person from another through attributes or affiliations, personhood is about giving all real people inalienable digital participation rights independent of identity, including protection against erosion of their democratic rights through identity loss, theft, coercion, or fakery. We explore and analyze alternative approaches to "proof of personhood" that may provide this missing foundation. Pseudonym parties marry the transparency of periodic physical-world events with the power of digital tokens between events. These tokens represent limited-term but renewable claims usable for purposes such as online voting or liquid democracy, sampled juries or deliberative polls, abuse-resistant social communication, or minting universal basic income in a permissionless cryptocurrency. Enhancing pseudonym parties to provide participants a moment of enforced physical security and privacy can address coercion and vote-buying risks that plague today's E-voting systems. We also examine other proposed approaches to proof of personhood, some of which offer conveniences such as all-online participation. These alternatives currently fall short of satisfying all the key digital personhood goals, unfortunately, but offer valuable insights into the challenges we face.