论文标题
基于方案的非线性模型预测控制供暖系统
Scenario-based Nonlinear Model Predictive Control for Building Heating Systems
论文作者
论文摘要
用于构建加热的最新模型预测控制(MPC)应用程序采用确定性控制器与非线性模型或具有随机MPC控制器的线性化模型。但是,确定性的MPC仅考虑一次干扰的单一实现及其性能很大程度上取决于干扰预测的质量,这可能导致低性能。实际上,建筑能源管理不足会导致高能成本和$ _2 $排放。另一方面,线性化模型无法捕获控制建筑物的某些动态和行为。在本文中,我们将基于随机场景的MPC(SBMPC)控制器与非线性Modelica模型结合在一起,该模型能够提供更丰富的建筑物描述并比线性模型更准确地捕获建筑物的动态。采用的SBMPC控制器考虑了通过统计准确模型获得的外部干扰的多个实现,以考虑不同的可能的干扰演变并鲁棒性地控制控制动作。为此,我们提出了一种用于构建温度控制的方案生成方法,该方法可以应用于几种外源扰动,例如\ \ \ solar辐照度,外部温度,并且满足了几种重要的停滞特性,而文献中采用的简单和较少准确的方法相反。我们通过几个模拟来展示我们提出的方法的好处,在这些模拟中,我们将方法与文献中的标准方法进行了比较,这是舒适性和能源成本之间权衡参数的多种组合。我们展示了我们的SBMPC控制器方法的表现如何优于文献中可用的标准控制器。
State-of-the-art Model Predictive Control (MPC) applications for building heating adopt either a deterministic controller together with a nonlinear model or a linearized model with a stochastic MPC controller. However, deterministic MPC only considers one single realization of the disturbances and its performance strongly depends on the quality of the forecast of the disturbances, which can lead to low performance. In fact, inadequate building energy management can lead to high energy costs and CO$_2$ emissions. On the other hand, a linearized model can fail to capture some dynamics and behavior of the building under control. In this article, we combine a stochastic scenario-based MPC (SBMPC) controller together with a nonlinear Modelica model that is able to provide a richer building description and to capture the dynamics of the building more accurately than linear models. The adopted SBMPC controller considers multiple realizations of the external disturbances obtained through a statistically accurate model, so as to consider different possible disturbance evolutions and to robustify the control action. To this purpose, we present a scenario generation method for building temperature control that can be applied to several exogenous perturbations, e.g.\ solar irradiance, outside temperature, and that satisfies several important stastistical properties, in contrast with simpler and less accurate methods adopted in the literature. We show the benefits of our proposed approach through several simulations in which we compare our method against the standard ones from the literature, for several combinations of a trade-off parameter between comfort and energy cost. We show how our SBMPC controller approach outperforms the standard controllers available in the literature.