论文标题
Cyclegan用于未受损的域转换,用于结构性健康监测和损害检测
CycleGAN for Undamaged-to-Damaged Domain Translation for Structural Health Monitoring and Damage Detection
论文作者
论文摘要
在过去的几十年中,数据科学领域的最新进展使许多其他领域受益,包括结构性健康监测(SHM)。特别是,由于观察到的基于振动的损害诊断,由于观察到的高表现从数据学习中观察到的高表现,因此已广泛利用了基于振动的损害诊断的人工智能(AI)(ML)和深度学习方法(DL)方法。除诊断外,损害预后学对于估计民用结构的剩余使用寿命至关重要。当前,基于AI的数据驱动方法用于损害诊断和预后,以结构的历史数据为中心,并且需要大量数据来预测模型。尽管其中一些方法是基于生成的模型,但它们用于执行ML或DL任务,例如分类,回归,聚类等。在这项研究中,开发了一种具有梯度惩罚(CycleWDCGAN-GP)模型的生成对抗网络(GAN)的变体,以研究“从未受损害到受损的状态的结构动态签名过渡”和“如果该过渡可以用于预测性损伤检测,则可以调查“结构动态签名的过渡”。这项研究的结果表明,所提出的模型可以准确地产生来自未损坏的响应的响应,反之亦然。换句话说,在结构仍处于健康(未损害)状态时,可以理解损坏的状况,反之亦然。这将在监督生命周期的表现以及预测结构的其余有用寿命方面采取更加主动的方法。
The recent advances in the data science field in the last few decades have benefitted many other fields including Structural Health Monitoring (SHM). Particularly, Artificial Intelligence (AI) such as Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) methods for vibration-based damage diagnostics of civil structures has been utilized extensively due to the observed high performances in learning from data. Along with diagnostics, damage prognostics is also vitally important for estimating the remaining useful life of civil structures. Currently, AI-based data-driven methods used for damage diagnostics and prognostics centered on historical data of the structures and require a substantial amount of data for prediction models. Although some of these methods are generative-based models, they are used to perform ML or DL tasks such as classification, regression, clustering, etc. after learning the distribution of the data. In this study, a variant of Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN), Cycle-Consistent Wasserstein Deep Convolutional GAN with Gradient Penalty (CycleWDCGAN-GP) model is developed to investigate the "transition of structural dynamic signature from an undamaged-to-damaged state" and "if this transition can be employed for predictive damage detection". The outcomes of this study demonstrate that the proposed model can accurately generate damaged responses from undamaged responses or vice versa. In other words, it will be possible to understand the damaged condition while the structure is still in a healthy (undamaged) condition or vice versa with the proposed methodology. This will enable a more proactive approach in overseeing the life-cycle performance as well as in predicting the remaining useful life of structures.