论文标题
NOMEN NON EST AMEN：为什么将超紧凑型物体识别为黑洞为何还为时过早
Nomen non est omen: Why it is too soon to identify ultra-compact objects as black holes
论文作者
论文摘要
黑洞在物理基础上起着关键作用，但是在观察天文学和理论研究中被认为是黑洞之间存在令人震惊的差异。尽管声称相反，但我们认为，根据当前可用的观察数据，确定观察到的天体物理黑洞候选者为真正的黑洞并不是合理的，并详细说明了支持这种显着索赔所需的必要证据。此外，我们研究了半经典重力的预测是否与竞争的理论模型同样兼容，并发现半经典论证有利于层次的配置。
Black holes play a pivotal role in the foundations of physics, but there is an alarming discrepancy between what is considered to be a black hole in observational astronomy and theoretical studies. Despite claims to the contrary, we argue that identifying the observed astrophysical black hole candidates as genuine black holes is not justified based on the currently available observational data, and elaborate on the necessary evidence required to support such a remarkable claim. In addition, we investigate whether the predictions of semiclassical gravity are equally compatible with competing theoretical models, and find that semiclassical arguments favor horizonless configurations.
